Chronicles of the Nephilim has largely been based upon the Divine Council worldview that has been explained in many free articles on the Chronicles Links Page and my book When Giants Were Upon the Earth. This involves the fallen Watchers from God’s heavenly host who are called the Sons of God. They led the world astray in the Days of Noah, that led to the Flood as Yahweh’s judgment. Deuteronomy 32:8-9, then speaks of how at the Tower of Babel, Yahweh divided the seventy nations according to the number of the fallen Sons of God and placed them under their authority. They became the “princes” (Dan. 10:13, 20-21) or “gods” of those pagan nations (Deut. 32:17; 4:19-21), rulers of those geographical territories.
So the headline was a trick, ya see, because Satan isn’t in hell, he’s in the heavens (Eph 2:2).
When earthly rulers battle on earth, the Bible describes the host of heaven battling with them in spiritual unity. In Daniel 10, hostilities between Greece and Persia is accompanied by the battle of heavenly Watchers over those Gentile nations (described as “princes”).
Daniel 10:13, 20
The prince of the kingdom of Persia withstood me twenty-one days, but Michael, one of the chief princes, came to help me, for I was left there with the kings of Persia.” …Then he said, “Do you know why I have come to you? But now I will return to fight against the prince of Persia; and when I go out, behold, the prince of Greece will come.
When Sisera fought with Israel, the earthly kings and heavenly authorities (host of heaven) are described interchangeably in unity. (previous posts showed that in the Bible, “host of heaven” and “stars” are used to mean both the stars we see in the sky and the gods of the nations, interchangeably Deut. 32:43; 4:19; ; Isa 14:12-13)
“The kings came, they fought; then fought the kings of Canaan…From heaven the stars fought, from their courses they fought against Sisera.
When God punishes earthly rulers, he punishes them along with the heavenly rulers (“host of heaven”) above and behind them.
On that day the Lord will punish the host of heaven, in heaven, and the kings of the earth, on the earth. They will be gathered together as prisoners in a pit; they will be shut up in a prison, and after many days they will be punished.
Though this notion of territorial archons or spiritual rulers is Biblical and carries over into intertestamental literature such as the Book of Enoch (1 En. 89:59, 62-63; 67) and others, it seems to lessen at the time of the New Testament.
The New Testament epistles speak of the spiritual principalities and powers that are behind the earthly rulers and powers to be sure (Eph. 6:12-13), but it appears to be more generic in reference. And after the death, resurrection, and ascension of Christ, these spiritual powers have been disarmed and overthrown (Col. 2:15, Luke 10:18), at least legally losing their hegemony (Eph. 1:20-23).
The fallen angelic powers are still around in the first century, but have been defanged with the inauguration of the Messianic kingdom of God.
But there is one of those fallen angelic powers that seems to rise up and grab extraordinary power in the New Testament: The satan (which translated, means, “Accuser”). The Accuser’s choice of Belial as a proper name in Jesus Triumphant is well-attested in Scripture and other ancient Jewish writings, especially the Dead Sea Scrolls from Qumran. He is also called Beliar, Mastema, and Sammael in other Second Temple literature. (For more details on the satan in the Old Testament, see my book When Giants Were Upon the Earth)
Throughout the Old Testament, the Hebrew word belial is used as a personification of death, wickedness, and treachery, as well as “an emotive term to describe individuals or groups who commit the most heinous crimes against the Israelite religious or social order, as well as their acts.” (For more details on the satan in the Old Testament, see my book When Giants Were Upon the Earth)
The Apostle Paul uses the proper name of Belial for the satan (using language similar to the Dead Sea Scrolls) in 2 Corinthians 6:14–15: “Do not be unequally yoked with unbelievers. For what partnership has righteousness with lawlessness? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial?”
Three times in the Gospel of John, this Accuser, Belial, is called “the ruler of this world” (Jn. 12:31, 14:30-31, 16:11), in 2 Cor. 4:4, “the god of this world.” In Eph. 2:2 he is called the “prince of the power of the air, the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience.” In fact, when Jesus was tempted by the satan in the desert, he offered Christ all the kingdoms of the world for his own “domain and glory; for it has been handed over to me, and I give it to whomever I wish” (Luke 4:6).
It seems as if the satan is the only Watcher god in authority over the nations, like he has all the power. What happened to all the other ones?
Walter Wink points out a possible key to the solution. In the intertestamental period,
“Much tradition identified Satan as the angel of Rome, thus adapting the angels-of-the-nations idea to the situation of Roman world-hegemony. Since Rome had conquered the entire Mediterranean region and much else besides, its angel-prince had become lord of all other angel-princes of the vanquished nations.This identification was already explicit at Qumran, where Rome and the Romans (the ‘Kittim’ of the War Scroll) are made the specific allies and agents of Satan and his host.”
The Dead Sea Scroll 11QMelch interprets Psalm 82 as describing Satan/Belial as the chief of the gods in the divine council to be punished for his unjust authority over the nations.
Another Jewish intertestamental document, the Testament of the Twelve Patriarchs, lists in several places Beliar, synonymous with Satan, as holding captive mankind.
In 3 Enoch 26:12 Sammael is called the Prince of Rome, just as Dubbiel is called the Prince of Persia (remember the “Prince of Persia” from Daniel 10?).
Just like the satan in the New Testament, Sammael is called the “prince of the accusers who is greater than all the princes of kingdoms that are in the height [heaven]” (3 Enoch 14:2). And just like the satan in the New Testament, Sammael’s name means “god of the blind” (2 Cor. 4:4).
But what about this notion of the ruler (archon), or god of this world? Is the world something bigger than the realm of this satanic Prince of Rome? To answer that, we will have to look at the idea of the world as presented in the New Testament.
It is common in the Bible to refer to the Roman Empire as “all the world” (oikoumene) which meant the known inhabited world under Rome’s power (Luke 2:1; Col. 1:6; Rom. 1:8). All the known nations were encompassed in its power and worldview, so it seems those national angelic entities over those nations would therefore also be under the authority of the Watcher of Rome.
If Belial, the satan therefore was “god” or “ruler” of that “world,” then most likely he had become the angelic authority over Rome, and it would make sense that the New Testament would focus on the satan over the other Watchers.
In this understanding, When Jesus the Messiah arrives and inaugurates the kingdom of God, he does so by “binding the strong man” the “god of this world,” the satan. His casting out of demons was a herald of casting down the satan’s power (John 12:31; Matt. 12:28-29), and taking authority over his world. It was as if one fell swoop of the highest heavenly power over the nations brought down all the enemies with him. Jesus destroyed the devil who had the power of death (Heb 2:14).
Then why was the satan still around? He still prowled around like a roaring lion seeking whom he may devour (1Pet. 5:8). His binding was for something very particular. We will examine this “binding” in the next post.
For additional Biblical and historical research related to this post, go to www.ChroniclesoftheNephilim.com under the menu listing, “Links” > Jesus Triumphant.
10 comments on “Who in Hell is Satan?”
So if the satan was the god of the “world” (Roman Empire),what about the nations outside the Roman Empire? Are their Watchers also under his authority ?
Yes. Just as the leaders of occupied territory are under the authority of the occupier.
Pardon me i didnt get your analogy. I was referring to the nations that weren’t occupied by the Roman Empire like India China etc. So they wouldnt be “under the authority of the occupier” ?
I don’t think so. Since the “world” of the NT was the Roman empire. It is an interesting question with a messy issue to consider because the Deut 32 allotment is also contextually the seventy nations. So, the question is, can we extrapolate out from there to assume that nations outside the seventy also had Watchers? My understanding is that the text is local in that it understood all the “earth” or better, “land” to be the seventy nations of Genesis, and “world” to be the Roman empire, but that they thought that was universal. But, my extrapolation is that, what was to them “all the earth” is what is to us, “the globe.” So, I am extrapolating based on the universal language. If they knew of other lands across the seas, I am confident they would include those, but they just didn’t know. God does, and we extend by way of analogy, but it is a theological extrapolation based on study.
Well, hope you will touch on this more in your Chronicles of the Watchers series. I haven’t read Qin yet but would very much like to see how the gods of China will be portrayed in this novel
In other words what u meant was that the 70 nations were the known world to the Israelites, as well as subsequently the Roman Empire. But the nations beyond the 70 nations which we know of today would most likely also have their Watchers who answer to the satan too. Based on theological extrapolation/inference. Am I right to say that?
I’m not willing to say that. It’s possible. But in the case of the satan, I do not think he was necessarily god over the other nations on the earth. If the other nations were ruled by other Watchers, but Rome was not their overlord, then those nations would not be under the satan of Rome. I think Psalm 82 indicates Messiah inheriting ALL the nations, not just those under the Roman “world” (Greek: Oikumene)
I see. It has been a pleasure conversing with you regarding this topic. I have a final question about the binding of the satan though. If he was “bound” in a legal sense so that he would no longer deceive the nations,then why Rev 20 talks about the mighty angel imprisoning him in the Abyss? How is that different to the pre-flood Watchers being bound into the earth? Because according to the ANE mindset the Abyss is both a physical and spiritual place.
It is possible that John is using that ANE image of the Abyss as a symbol to describe the spiritual reality of the power of the Gospel. Since it is a vision, it does not have to be “literal” since most things are symbolic in the vision. Thank you for your rigorous questions and smart dialogue.